Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 06:32

Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Something Big Is Twisting Mercury’s Crust - Gizmodo
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Log in to your Samsung account by the end of next month or forever hold your peace - Android Police
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Can you write a short story with a twist ending?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why Mike Tenay Passed on WWE x AAA Worlds Collide Appearance Revealed - Ringside News
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter learns new trick at the age of 19: ‘very large rolls’ - theregister.com
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
People Can Fly cancels 2 games including Square Enix project - Video Games Chronicle